Next: Why do I get
Up: Questions for both versions
Previous: What do I do
  Contents
In stage one the EM algorithm is moving deterministically
through the parameter space and increasing the likelihood at every
iteration. The EM algorithm in theory never stops, it just starts
taking tinier steps as it gets very close to the maximium, sort of
like the runner in zeno's paradox. Since the algorithm needs to stop,
Amelia will check the size of the last step, and if it is small enough
to be considered negligable, will end the EM algorithm. If EM runs
for more than a few hundred iterations, it is probably because this
step size is never quite getting as small as Amelia would like. This
is more common as the number of parameters and fraction of missing
data increases, since these conditions are associated with a flatter
likelihood. Here's what you can do.
First, try setting a slight prior (such as _AMempri), and
see if that solves this problem. If the problem continues, change the
step size by settting the global _AMdrtol to a larger number
(the default is 0.00001).
If this does not work, you can just tell Amelia to end the EM
algorithm after a certain number of steps, regardless of how large the
last step size was. To do this set _AMembrn=1 and
_AMburn to some large number of steps (say 500).
These last two strategies violate no assumptions, especially since the
next stages of the algorithm just need an approximation to where the
maximium of likelihood is. The approximation error will be accounted
for later in the importance sampling stage.
Next: Why do I get
Up: Questions for both versions
Previous: What do I do
  Contents
Gary King
2003-07-25