
Next: Preface Up: A Solution... Previous: List of Figures
| 1.1 | The Ecological Inference Problem at the District Level | 13 |
| 1.2 | The Ecological Inference Problem at the Precinct Level | 14 |
| 1.3 | Sample Ecological Inferences | 16 |
| 2.1 | Basic Notation for Precinct i | 29 |
| 2.2 | Alternative Notation for Precinct i | 31 |
| 2.3 | Simplified Notation for Precinct i | 31 |
| 4.1 | Comparing Goodman Model Parameters to the Parameters of Interest in the |
70 |
| 9.1 | Consequences of Spatial Autocorrelation: Monte Carlo Evidence | 168 |
| 9.2 | Consequences of Distributional Misspecification: Monte Carlo Evidence | 189 |
| 10.1 | Maximum Likelihood Estimates | 202 |
| 10.2 | Reparameterized Maximum Likelihood Estimates | 203 |
| 10.3 | Verifying Estimates of |
207 |
| 11.1 | Evidence of Aggregation Bias in South Carolina | 219 |
| 11.2 | Goodman Model Estimates: Poverty by Sex | 220 |
| 12.1 | Evidence of Aggregation Bias in Kentucky | 228 |
| 12.2 | 80% Confidence Intervals for |
230 |
| 15.1 | Example of a Larger Table | 265 |
| 15.2 | Notation for a Large Table | 268 |

Next: Preface Up: A Solution... Previous: List of Figures