Gary King Homepage Previous: Format: Up: HIST Next: Options:

Purpose:

HIST graphs a ``kernel density estimate'' of your district-level observed YVOTE variable or your district-level predictions. A kernel density estimate is a smooth version of a histogram.See Gary King (``Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage," British Journal of Political Science, 21, 1 (January, 1991): 119-128) for an example from the political science literature. A kernel density estimate puts a distribution around each district and averages all the distributions to get the plotted graph. The larger the variance of these individual distributions, the smoother the whole graph will be. If the variances are zero (which is not allowed in HIST), then each district will be represented by a spike at its vote proportion. For the individual distributions, HIST uses a normal kernel truncated from below at zero and from above at one. The key point to remember in interpreting the graph is that the total area under the curve is equal to 1.0 (i.e. all the districts). Thus, the proportion of districts more than 70 percent Democratic can be seen on the graph by looking at the proportion of the area under the curve to the right of 0.7. Also printed on the graph are ``whiskers,'' which are short lines at the bottom indicating the vote proportion for each individual district.If you cannot see the whiskers for a run, specify the MAX option. The graph drawn by HIST shows the overall distribution of partisanship among districts in a state. For example, if few districts are near the 0.5 point, then the state has relatively few competitive districts. If most of the districts clump over on the right side of the graph, then the state is predominately Democratic. Another pattern, which might be produced by a Democratic gerrymander, would have a few Republicans winning by very large margens and many Democrats, each winning with just a little over $ 0.5$ of the vote.

Since HIST works with observed and predicted results, you can compare results from an actual election with that under proposed redistricting plans. For actual election results, you only need to define YVOTE. For predicted results, first set up a prediction: YVOTE year var $ <$ dataset; XVARS vars $ <$ dataset;, with XVARS defined for the most recent election for which you have data. You must also issue a REG; command or run any of the analysis procedures. You then can make a prediction by defining YVOTE with PREDICT, followed by XNEW.



Gary King 2006-01-07