A Consensus on Second Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models
Christopher Adolph, Gary King, Kenneth Shotts, Michael Herron. 2003.
"A Consensus on Second Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models".
Political Analysis, 11, Pp. 86–94.
Abstract
Since Herron and Shotts (2003a and hereinafter HS), Adolph and King (2003 andhereinafter AK), and Herron and Shotts (2003b and hereinafter HS2), the four of us have iterated many more times, learned a great deal, and arrived at a consensus on this issue. This paper describes our joint recommendations for how to run second-stage ecological regressions, and provides detailed analyses to back up our claims.
See Also
- [Paper] Analyzing Second Stage Ecological Regressions (2003)
- [Paper] Finding New Information for Ecological Inference Models: A Comment on Jon Wakefield, 'Ecological Inference in 2X2 Tables' (2004)
- [Paper] Geography, Statistics, and Ecological Inference (2000)
- [Paper] Isolating Spatial Autocorrelation, Aggregation Bias, and Distributional Violations in Ecological Inference (2002)
- [Paper] The Future of Ecological Inference Research: A Reply to Freedman et Al. (1999)
- [Paper] Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: The RxC Case (2001)
- [Paper] Binomial-Beta Hierarchical Models for Ecological Inference (1999)
- [Book] Ecological Inference (2006)