Advantages of Conflictual Redistricting
Andrew Gelman, Gary King. 1996.
"Advantages of Conflictual Redistricting".
In Fixing the Boundary: Defining and Redefining Single-Member Electoral Districts, edited by Iain McLean and David Butler, Pp. 207–218. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth Publishing Company.

Abstract
This article describes the results of an analysis we did of state legislative elections in the United States, where each state is required to redraw the boundaries of its state legislative districts every ten years. In the United States, redistrictings are sometimes controlled by the Democrats, sometimes by the Republicans, and sometimes by bipartisan committees, but never by neutral boundary commissions. Our goal was to study the consequences of redistricting and at the conclusion of this article, we discuss how our findings might be relevant to British elections.
See Also
- [Paper] Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting (1994)
- [Software] JudgeIt II: A Program for Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans (2010)
- [Book] Racial Fairness in Legislative Redistricting (1996)
- [Paper] A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans (1994)
- [Paper] Estimating the Electoral Consequences of Legislative Redistricting (1990)
- [Paper] Letter to US Census Bureau: 'Request for Release of 'noisy Measurements File' by September 30 Along With Redistricting Data Products' (2021)
- [Presentation] Scientific Measurement in Redistricting Research (Princeton University) (2021)
- [Paper] Edited Transcript of a Talk on Partisan Symmetry at the 'Redistricting and Representation Forum' (2018)