Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, Bernard Grofman, Andrew Gelman, and Jonathan Katz in Support of Neither Party
Gary King, Bernard Grofman, Andrew Gelman, Jonathan Katz. 2005.
"Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, Bernard Grofman, Andrew Gelman, and Jonathan Katz in Support of Neither Party".
Abstract
For context, see Bernard Grofman and Gary King. 2008. “The Future of Partisan Symmetry as a Judicial Test for Partisan Gerrymandering after LULAC v. Perry.” Election Law Journal, 6, 1, Pp. 2-35.
See Also
- [Court Brief] Brief of Heather K. Gerken, Jonathan N. Katz, Gary King, Larry J. Sabato, and Samuel S.-H. Wang As Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees (2017)
- [Paper] Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections (1987)
- [Book] Racial Fairness in Legislative Redistricting (1996)
- [Paper] Seats, Votes, and Gerrymandering: Measuring Bias and Representation in Legislative Redistricting (1987)
- [Paper] The Essential Role of Statistical Inference in Evaluating Electoral Systems: A Response to DeFord et Al. (2023)
- [Court Brief] Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (2022)
- [Court Brief] Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae (2012)
- [Paper] Expert Report of Gary King, in Bowyer et Al. V. Ducey (Governor) et Al., US District Court, District of Arizona (2020)