Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents
Ian Ayres, Richard A. Berk, Richard R.W. Brooks, Daniel E. Ho, Gary King, Kevin Quinn, Donald B. Rubin, Sherod Thaxton. 2022.
"Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents".

Abstract
Amici curiae are leaders in the field of quantitative social science and statistical methodology. Amici submit this brief to point out the substantial methodological flaws in the “mismatch” research discussed in the Brief for Richard Sander as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner. Professor Sander’s mismatch hypothesis is unsupported and based on work that fails to adhere to basic tenets of research design.
See Also
- [Paper] Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae (2012)
- [Paper] Brief of Heather K. Gerken, Jonathan N. Katz, Gary King, Larry J. Sabato, and Samuel S.-H. Wang As Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees (2017)
- [Paper] Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, Bernard Grofman, Andrew Gelman, and Jonathan Katz in Support of Neither Party (2005)
- [Presentation] Is Survey Instability Due to Respondents Who Don't Understand Politics or Researchers Who Don't Understand Respondents? (Caltech) (2024)
- [Presentation] Who's to Blame for Survey Instability: Respondents With Nonexistent Preferences or Researchers With Flawed Measures? (talk at Bocconi University, 3 24 2026) (2026)
- [Presentation] Who's to Blame for Survey Instability: Respondents With Random Preferences or Researchers With Flawed Measures? (talk at Johns Hopkins University, 2 12 2026) (2026)
- [Patent] Instructional Support Platform for Interactive Learning Platforms (2nd) (2020)
- [Paper] Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evaluations of Partisan Fairness in District-Based Democracies (2020)