Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents
Ian Ayres, Richard A. Berk, Richard R.W. Brooks, Daniel E. Ho, Gary King, Kevin Quinn, Donald B. Rubin, Sherod Thaxton. 2022.
"Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents".
Abstract
Amici curiae are leaders in the field of quantitative social science and statistical methodology. Amici submit this brief to point out the substantial methodological flaws in the “mismatch” research discussed in the Brief for Richard Sander as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner. Professor Sander’s mismatch hypothesis is unsupported and based on work that fails to adhere to basic tenets of research design.
See Also
- [Paper] Data, Analyses, and Reports for the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Filed With the U.S. Department of Justice (2012)
- [Paper] Edited Transcript of a Talk on Partisan Symmetry at the 'Redistricting and Representation Forum' (2018)
- [Paper] How to Conquer Partisan Gerrymandering (2017)
- [Paper] How to Measure Legislative District Compactness If You Only Know It When You See It (2021)
- [Paper] The Future of Partisan Symmetry As a Judicial Test for Partisan Gerrymandering After LULAC V. Perry (2008)
- [Paper] Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evaluations of Partisan Fairness in District-Based Democracies (2020)
- [Paper] There's a Simple Solution to the Latest Census Fight (2021)
- [Court Brief] Brief of Empirical Scholars As Amici Curiae (2012)