Good Research and Bad Research: Extending Zimile's Criticism
Gary King, Daniel Walsh. 1993.
"Good Research and Bad Research: Extending Zimile's Criticism".
Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, Pp. 397–401.

Abstract
Herbert Zimiles has written a provocative article on quantitative research. Because his specific critiques of research on infant day care are nominal examples of his much broader arguments, we focus only on his general methodological perspectives in this brief comment. We write as methodologists, a qualitative researcher with a quantitative background (Walsh) and a quantitative researcher completing a book on qualitative research (King and see King, Keohane & Verba, in preparation).
See Also
- [Presentation] Interpersonal and Cross-Cultural Incomparability in Survey Research (2025)
- [Presentation] Statistically Valid Inferences from Privacy Protected Data (Pew Research Center) (2025)
- [Paper] Differentially Private Survey Research (2024)
- [Book] Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, New Edition (2021)
- [Presentation] Empowering Social Science Research With Industry Partnerships (Dean's Symposium on Social Science Innovations, Harvard) (2021)
- [Presentation] Scientific Measurement in Redistricting Research (Princeton University) (2021)
- [Presentation] Statistically Valid Inferences from Privacy Protected Data (Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee) (2020)
- [Paper] The SilverLining Project: Finding Social Good in Clouds on the Dark Web (2020)