Good Research and Bad Research: Extending Zimile's Criticism
Gary King, Daniel Walsh. 1993.
"Good Research and Bad Research: Extending Zimile's Criticism".
Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, Pp. 397–401.
Abstract
Herbert Zimiles has written a provocative article on quantitative research. Because his specific critiques of research on infant day care are nominal examples of his much broader arguments, we focus only on his general methodological perspectives in this brief comment. We write as methodologists, a qualitative researcher with a quantitative background (Walsh) and a quantitative researcher completing a book on qualitative research (King and see King, Keohane & Verba, in preparation).
See Also
- [Paper] A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data (2007)
- [Software] Booc.Io: An Education System With Hierarchical Concept Maps (2017)
- [Paper] Education and Scholarship by Video (2021)
- [Paper] Ensuring the Data Rich Future of the Social Sciences (2011)
- [Paper] How Human Subjects Research Rules Mislead You and Your University, and What to Do About It (2016)
- [Paper] How Social Science Research Can Improve Teaching (2013)
- [Paper] Publication, Publication (2006)
- [Paper] Restructuring the Social Sciences: Reflections from Harvard's Institute for Quantitative Social Science (2014)