Isolating Spatial Autocorrelation, Aggregation Bias, and Distributional Violations in Ecological Inference
Gary King. 2002.
"Isolating Spatial Autocorrelation, Aggregation Bias, and Distributional Violations in Ecological Inference".
Political Analysis, 10, Pp. 298–300.

Abstract
This is an invited response to an article by Anselin and Cho. I make two main points: The numerical results in this article violate no conclusions from prior literature, and the absence of the deterministic information from the bounds in the article’s analyses invalidates its theoretical discussion of spatial autocorrelation and all of its actual simulation results. An appendix shows how to draw simulations correctly.
See Also
- [Paper] A Consensus on Second Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models (2003)
- [Paper] Analyzing Second Stage Ecological Regressions (2003)
- [Paper] Finding New Information for Ecological Inference Models: A Comment on Jon Wakefield, 'Ecological Inference in 2X2 Tables' (2004)
- [Paper] Geography, Statistics, and Ecological Inference (2000)
- [Paper] The Future of Ecological Inference Research: A Reply to Freedman et Al. (1999)
- [Paper] Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: The RxC Case (2001)
- [Book] Ecological Inference (2006)
- [Book] Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies (2004)