@newspaperarticle {598216,
	title = {How to conquer partisan gerrymandering},
	journal = {Boston Globe (Op-Ed)},
	volume = {292},
	number = {179},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {A10},
	abstract = {PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING has long been reviled for thwarting the will of the voters. Yet while voters are acting disgusted, the US Supreme Court has only discussed acting {\textemdash} declaring they have the constitutional right to fix the problem, but doing nothing. But as better data and computer algorithms are now making gerrymandering increasingly effective, continuing to sidestep the issue could do permanent damage to American democracy. In\&nbsp;Gill v. Whitford, the soon-to-be-decided challenge to Wisconsin{\textquoteright}s 2011 state Assembly redistricting plan, the court could finally fix the problem for the whole country. Judging from the oral arguments, the key to the case is whether the court endorses the concept of {\textquotedblleft}partisan symmetry,{\textquotedblright} a specific standard for treating political parties equally in allocating legislative seats based on voting.},
	url = {https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2017/12/26/how-conquer-partisan-gerrymandering/MRdsgd3cx7R6MiodBFW5QI/story.html},
	author = {Gary King and Robert X Browning}
}
